4.5 Article

Investigation of Various Factors on Iodide Depletion Efficiency in Photocatalytic Water Splitting in Optofluidic Microreactors

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 8507-8518

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-07014-x

Keywords

Hydrogen production; Optofluidic microreactor; Iodide; Iodate mediator; Photocatalyst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water splitting is a promising method to produce hydrogen as fuel, but it has lower production rate compared to common methods. This study focuses on the development of microreactors and photocatalysts to increase the production rate. Three optofluidic microreactors with different reaction chambers were fabricated and their performance was monitored using iodide/iodate as a redox mediator.
Water splitting is a promising method to produce hydrogen as fuel. But it has low production rate in comparison with the common methods. There are some developments in microreactors and photocatalysts that combine these two methods to increase the production rate. Design of reaction chamber and also the loading of photocatalysts affect the outcome of the reaction. In this study, three optofluidic microreactors with different reaction chambers were fabricated. To monitor the performance of the fabricated microreactors, a water splitting reaction was performed in the presence of iodide/iodate as a redox mediator. Various factors such as iodide concentration, flow rate, and the amount of Pt deposited on Pt/TiO2 were investigated. The durability of used photocatalyst in micro-spiraled and micro-pillared microreactors was also studied. The optofluidic microreactor with pillared structure showed higher hydrogen production compared to the spiral and grooved structure. The optimal value of Pt loading is 1% w/w so that the iodide depletion efficiency changes over time from 5.7 to 3.8% while that for 1.5% w/w varies from 3.2 to 0.67%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available