4.5 Article

Salivary film thickness and MUC5B levels at various intra-oral surfaces

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 859-869

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04626-3

Keywords

Salivary film thickness; Salivary secretions; MUC5B level; Palatal surface area; Sialopapers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the salivary film thickness and MUC5B levels in various intra-oral locations were investigated in healthy volunteers. The findings demonstrate unequal distribution of the salivary film and MUC5B levels in different regions of the oral soft tissues. Furthermore, there was no association between the palatal surface area and the salivary film thickness.
Objectives In this study, we investigated the salivary film thickness and the MUC5B levels at various intra-oral locations in healthy volunteers, with a focus on the palate. Besides, measurements of the palatal surface area were included to explore the possible relationships between the palatal surface area and the palatal salivary film and MUC5B levels. Materials and methods The salivary film thickness was determined using filter strips, which were pressed to the mucosal surfaces of five different intra-oral locations; conductance was then analysed using a Periotron. After elution of the strips, the MUC5B levels at various intra-oral locations were determined using ELISA. The palatal surface area was measured using an intra-oral scanner. The surface area was subsequently calculated using the software. Results The anterior tongue had the thickest salivary film and also the highest levels of MUC5B, while the anterior palate had the thinnest salivary film and lowest MUC5B levels. There was no association between the palatal surface area and the salivary film thickness of the palate. Conclusion The salivary film and MUC5B levels are unequally distributed over the intra-oral regions of the soft tissues. The lack of association between the palatal surface area and the salivary film thickness indicates that a larger surface area is not associated with a relative thinner palatal salivary film.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available