4.4 Review

Effects of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Stroke: a Systematic Review

Journal

CEREBELLUM
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 973-984

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01464-7

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) shows promise in improving poststroke language and motor dysfunction, especially in gait. However, the current evidence is insufficient and the quality of studies is low, indicating the need for more regulated studies with larger sample sizes to validate its therapeutic effect.
Background The cerebellum is involved in regulating motor, affective, and cognitive processes. It is a promising target for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) intervention in stroke. Objectives To review the current evidence for cerebellar tDCS (ctDCS) in stroke, its problems, and its future directions. Methods We searched the Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and PubMed databases. Eligible studies were identified after a systematic literature review of the effects of ctDCS in stroke patients. The changes in assessment scale scores and objective indicators after stimulation were reviewed. Results Eleven studies were included in the systematic review, comprising 169 stroke patients. Current evidence suggests that anode tDCS on the right cerebellar hemisphere does not appear to enhance language processing in stroke patients. Compared with the sham group, stroke patients showed a significant improvement in the verb generation task after cathodal ctDCS stimulation. However, with regard to naming, two studies came to the opposite conclusion. The contralesional anodal ctDCS is expected to improve standing balance but not motor learning in stroke patients. The bipolar bilateral ctDCS protocol to target dentate nuclei (PO10h and PO9h) had a positive effect on standing balance, goal-directed weight shifting, and postural control in stroke patients. Conclusions ctDCS appears to improve poststroke language and motor dysfunction (particularly gait). However, the evidence for these results was insufficient, and the quality of the relevant studies was low. ctDCS stimulation parameters and individual factors of participants may affect the therapeutic effect of ctDCS. Researchers need to take a more regulated approach in the future to conduct studies with large sample sizes. Overall, ctDCS remains a promising stroke intervention technique that could be used in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available