4.7 Article

CT-based Bosniak classification of cystic renal lesions: is version 2019 an improvement on version 2005?

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 1297-1306

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09082-x

Keywords

Kidney neoplasms; Kidney diseases; Cystic; Observer variation; Tomography; X-ray computed

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the 2005 and 2019 versions of the CT-based Bosniak classification systems for risk stratification of cystic renal lesions. The results showed that there was no significant improvement in diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between the two versions. However, the inter-reader agreement decreased when the 2019 version was dichotomized according to management strategy.
Objective To compare the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the CT-based v2019 versus v2005 Bosniak classification systems for risk stratification of cystic renal lesions (CRL). Methods This retrospective study included adult patients with CRL identified on CT scan between 2005 and 2018. The reference standard was histopathology or a minimum 4-year imaging follow-up. The studies were reviewed independently by five readers (three senior, two junior), blinded to pathology results and imaging follow-up, who assigned Bosniak categories based on the 2005 and 2019 versions. Diagnostic performance of v2005 and v2019 Bosniak classifications for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions was calculated by dichotomizing CRL into the potential for ablative therapy (III-IV) or conservative management (I-IIF). Inter-reader agreement was calculated using Light's Kappa. Results One hundred thirty-nine patients with 149 CRL (33 malignant) were included. v2005 and v2019 Bosniak classifications achieved similar diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 91% vs 91% and a specificity of 89% vs 88%, respectively. Inter-reader agreement for overall Bosniak category assignment was substantial for v2005 (kappa = 0.78) and v2019 (kappa = 0.75) between senior readers but decreased for v2019 when the Bosniak classification was dichotomized to conservative management (I-IIF) or ablative therapy (III-IV) (0.80 vs 0.71, respectively). For v2019, wall thickness was the morphological feature with the poorest inter-reader agreement (kappa = 0.43 and 0.18 for senior and junior readers, respectively). Conclusion No significant improvement in diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement was shown between v2005 and v2019. The observed decrease in inter-reader agreement in v2019 when dichotomized according to management strategy may reflect the more stringent morphological criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available