4.2 Article

Previtamin D action spectrum: Challenging CIE towards a standard

Journal

LIGHTING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 4-5, Pages 487-497

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/14771535221122937

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In 2006, CIE published a technical report on the action spectrum for the production of previtamin D-3 in human skin. The report has been widely used for 15 years and has been challenged several times. However, no alternative action spectrum has shown clear advantages over the CIE version. A CIE workshop concluded that the CIE action spectrum may need to be amended, but until a clear alternative is found, the CIE action spectrum should continue to be used.
In 2006, CIE published a technical report on an action spectrum for the production of previtamin D-3 in human skin. CIE procedure is to publish guidelines (e.g., an action spectrum) and let the community test them before moving to define a standard. The CIE previtamin D-3 action spectrum has been in use for 15 years, and challenged on several occasions; a number of alternative action spectra have been suggested. To date (2021) no alternative action spectrum has shown clear advantages over the CIE version when tested against experimental outcomes. Thus, the CIE action spectrum remains widely used, but not fully accepted as best representing the photobiology in human skin leading to synthesis of vitamin D. We report on a CIE workshop designed to address the challenges to the CIE action spectrum, and explore alternative action spectra. The workshop concluded that the CIE action spectrum probably requires amendment, with several candidates for consideration in determining any changes. However, until there is a clear alternative, the CIE action spectrum should remain in use whilst ensuring full spectral information about sources of ultraviolet radiation. Thus, results are comparable between studies and can be recalculated to an updated action spectrum if necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available