4.4 Article

Reirradiation on spine metastases: an Italian survey on behalf of palliative care and reirradiation study groups of Italian association of radiotherapy and clinical oncology (AIRO)

Journal

CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 408-416

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02951-3

Keywords

Radiotherapy; Reirradiation; Pain; SBRT; Spinal cord

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This survey provides insights into the treatment choices and factors considered by radiation oncologists in Italy for patients with spinal metastases, with a specific focus on reirradiation. Palliative radiotherapy remains a field of interest, with traditional techniques being preferred for patients with shorter life expectancy and newer technologies for those with longer life expectancy. Factors such as time between treatments, dose delivered, vertebral stability, symptoms, and performance status are taken into consideration for retreatment decisions. The most feared complications are myelopathy and vertebral fractures.
Aim This survey derived from the collaboration between the Palliative Care and Reirradiation Study Groups of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Its aim was to obtain a real snapshot on the treatments of spinal metastases, focusing on reirradiation, among radiation oncologists in Italy. Methods The survey was elaborated on SurveyMonkey's online interface and was sent via e-mail to all Radiation Oncologists of AIRO that were invited to anonymously fill in the electronic form within 60 days. The questionnaire was prepared by the AIRO Palliative care and Reirradiation Study Groups and it consisted of 36 questions, 19 single-choice questions, 10 multiple-choice questions and 6 open questions. The data were analyzed and represented with tables and graphs. Results The survey shows that palliative radiotherapy remains a field of interest for most ROs in the Italian centers. 3D Conventional Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) alone or in combination with other techniques is the primary choice for patients with a life expectancy of less than 6 months. For patients with a life expectancy of more than six months, there is an increased use of new technologies, such as Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT). Factors considered for retreatment are time between first and second treatment, dose delivered to spine metastasis and spinal cord in the first treatment, vertebral stability, symptoms, and/or performance status. The most feared complication are myelopathy followed by vertebral fracture and local recurrence. This explain an increasing focus on patient selection and the use of high technology in the treatment of metastatic patients. Conclusion Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and image-guided radiotherapy allow the administration of ablative RT doses while sparing the constraints of healthy tissue in spinal metastases. However, there is still an unclear and heterogeneous reality in the reirradiation of spinal metastases. A national registry with the aim of clarifying the most controversial aspects of vertebral metastasis retreatments will enable better management of these patients and design more targeted study designs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available