4.5 Article

The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: Five years later

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The Reproducibility of Statistical Results in Psychological Research: An Investigation Using Unpublished Raw Data

Richard Artner et al.

Summary: The study investigated the reproducibility of major statistical conclusions from 46 articles published in 2012 in three APA journals, finding that 70% of statistical claims were successfully reproduced, with 7% of originally significant claims no longer significant. Successfully reproduced results were often the outcome of cumbersome and time-consuming trial-and-error work, suggesting that APA reporting style may make verification of statistical results difficult or impossible.

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2021)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Using and Understanding Power in Psychological Research: A Survey Study

Elizabeth Collins et al.

Summary: Psychological studies often suffer from small sample sizes and researchers' lack of accurate intuition about sensible sample sizes and power levels. While there is a high use of power analysis, researchers still face challenges with complex research designs and effect size estimation, and struggle to accurately define power. Clearer educational material and guidelines should be provided to help researchers compute a priori power analyses for their research planning.

COLLABRA-PSYCHOLOGY (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The citation advantage of linking publications to research data

Giovanni Colavizza et al.

PLOS ONE (2020)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Why researchers should share their analytic code Retraction of a trial shows the importance of transparency

Ben Goldacre et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)

Article Statistics & Probability

The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known

Robert J. Calin-Jageman et al.

AMERICAN STATISTICIAN (2019)

Letter Multidisciplinary Sciences

REPLY TO LEDGERWOOD: Predictions without analysis plans are inert

Brian A. Nosek et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)

Article Psychology, Biological

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Colin F. Camerer et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2018)

Article Psychology

Data Sharing in Psychology: A Survey on Barriers and Preconditions

Bobby Lee Houtkoop et al.

ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed?

Maria J. Blanca et al.

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY (2018)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

Franca Agnoli et al.

PLOS ONE (2017)

Article Cell Biology

What does research reproducibility mean?

Steven N. Goodman et al.

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE (2016)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

Mallory C. Kidwell et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Alexander A. Aarts et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Promoting an open research culture

B. A. Nosek et al.

SCIENCE (2015)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The New Statistics: Why and How

Geoff Cumming

PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2014)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So

Patrizio E. Tressoldi et al.

PLOS ONE (2013)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The New Statistics: A How-To Guide

Geoff Cumming

AUSTRALIAN PSYCHOLOGIST (2013)