4.7 Article

Premorbid obesity, but not nutrition, prevents critical illness-induced muscle wasting and weakness

Journal

JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 89-101

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12131

Keywords

Critical illness; Obesity; Skeletal muscle; Metabolism

Funding

  1. Methusalem Program - Flemish Government [METH08/07]
  2. European Research Council Advanced Grant from the Ideas Program of the European Union seventh framework program [AdvG-2012-321670]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThe obesity paradox' of critical illness refers to better survival with a higher body mass index. We hypothesized that fat mobilized from excess adipose tissue during critical illness provides energy more efficiently than exogenous macronutrients and could prevent lean tissue wasting. MethodsIn lean and premorbidly obese mice, the effect of 5days of sepsis-induced critical illness on body weight and composition, muscle wasting, and weakness was assessed, each with fasting and parenteral feeding. Also, in lean and overweight/obese prolonged critically ill patients, markers of muscle wasting and weakness were compared. ResultsIn mice, sepsis reduced body weight similarly in the lean and obese, but in the obese with more fat loss and less loss of muscle mass, better preservation of myofibre size and muscle force, and less loss of ectopic lipids, irrespective of administered feeding. These differences between lean and obese septic mice coincided with signs of more effective hepatic fatty acid and glycerol metabolism, and ketogenesis in the obese. Also in humans, better preservation of myofibre size and muscle strength was observed in overweight/obese compared with lean prolonged critically ill patients. ConclusionsDuring critical illness premorbid obesity, but not nutrition, optimized utilization of stored lipids and attenuated muscle wasting and weakness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available