4.7 Article

Impact of deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) on coronary artery calcium quantification

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 3832-3838

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09287-0

Keywords

Coronary artery calcium; Image reconstruction; Deep learning; Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiovascular risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) systematically underestimates Agatston coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, suggesting caution in its use for cardiovascular risk assessment.
Background Deep learning image reconstructions (DLIR) have been recently introduced as an alternative to filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms for computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of DLIR on image quality and quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in comparison to FBP. Methods One hundred patients were consecutively enrolled. Image quality-associated variables (noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)) as well as CAC-derived parameters (Agatston score, mass, and volume) were calculated from images reconstructed by using FBP and three different strengths of DLIR (low (DLIR_L), medium (DLIR_M), and high (DLIR_H)). Patients were stratified into 4 risk categories according to the Coronary Artery Calcium - Data and Reporting System (CAC-DRS) classification: 0 Agatston score (very low risk), 1-99 Agatston score (mildly increased risk), Agatston 100-299 (moderately increased risk), and & GE; 300 Agatston score (moderately-to-severely increased risk). Results In comparison to standard FBP, increasing strength of DLIR was associated with a significant and progressive decrease of image noise (p < 0.001) alongside a significant and progressive increase of both SNR and CNR (p < 0.001). The use of incremental levels of DLIR was associated with a significant decrease of Agatston CAC score and CAC volume (p < 0.001), while mass score remained unchanged when compared to FBP (p = 0.232). The underestimation of Agatston CAC led to a CAC-DRS misclassification rate of 8%. Conclusion DLIR systematically underestimates Agatston CAC score. Therefore, DLIR should be used cautiously for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available