4.3 Review

Scientometric analysis of highly cited papers on avascular necrosis of the femoral head from 1991 to 2022

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s10195-023-00709-3

Keywords

Bibliometrics; Scientometrics; Avascular necrosis; Osteonecrosis; Femoral head; Hip

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study conducted a scientometric analysis to identify the characteristics and research status of highly cited papers (HCPs) in the field of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH).
IntroductionA highly cited paper (HCP) is considered a landmark that can influence both research and clinical practice. The characteristics of HCPs in avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH) were identified and the research status was explored in a scientometric analysis.MethodsThe present bibliometric analysis were based on the Scopus database from 1991 to 2021. Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer were used for co-authorship, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis. From 8496 papers, only 2.9% (244) were HCPs, with 200.8 citations registered per article.ResultsOf the HCPs, 11.9% and 12.3% were externally funded and had international collaboration, respectively. These were published in 84 journals by 1625 authors from 425 organizations of 33 countries. The USA, Japan, Switzerland, and Israel were the leading countries.The lead research organizations were Sinai Hospital and John Hopkins University (USA). The most impactful organizations were University of Arkansas for Medical Science, and Good Samaritan Hospital (USA). R.A. Mont (USA) and K.H. Koo (South Korea) were the most prolific contributing authors, while R. Ganz (Switzerland) and R.S. Weinstein (USA) registered the most impactful contributions. The most prolific publishing journal was the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.ConclusionThe HCPs contributed to the knowledge of AVNFH by examining research perspectives and identifying important subareas through keyword analysis.Level of evidence: Not applicable.Trial registration: Not applicable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available