4.7 Article

Combustion inhibition and enhancement of premixed methane-air flames by halon replacements

Journal

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
Volume 162, Issue 1, Pages 41-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.07.006

Keywords

Fire suppression; Halon 1301; Aircraft cargo bay fire protection; Halon replacement; Refrigerant flammability; Explosion suppression

Funding

  1. Boeing Company
  2. ARRA grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Apparent combustion enhancement by some halon replacement fire suppressants (proposed for use in aircraft cargo bays) has been observed in full-scale, constant-volume tests at the FAA. In order to explore the phenomena, laboratory-scale constant-volume combustion experiments were performed. The maximum explosion pressure and burning velocity were measured for methane-air flames with added CF3Br (Halon 1301), C6F12O (Novec 1230), C3H2F3Br (2-BTP), and C2HF5 (HFC-125). The explosion pressure, for initially stoichiometric flames, was increased mildly (up to 11% and 6%) with C6F12O and C2HF5 added at low concentrations, while at lean conditions (Phi = 0.6), it was increased about 50% for added C6F12O, C3H2F3Br, or C2HF5, at agent volume fractions X-a= 0.02, 0.03, and 0.06. The burning velocity for initially stoichiometric flames was always decreased with addition of any of the agents, whereas, for the lean conditions, it increased with added C6F12O or C2HF5 (32% and 14%, at X-a = 0.01 and 0.03). Burning velocities at higher initial pressure (3 bar) and temperature (400 K) showed lower inhibition effectiveness (than at ambient conditions) for the stoichiometric flames, and larger enhancement for the lean flames (and the effect was due primarily to the temperature increase). CF3Br did not increase the explosion pressure or burning velocity for any of the tested conditions. Equilibrium calculations were used to interpret the experiments. The present work is consistent with the FAA results and previous analysis of the full-scale tests. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available