4.6 Article

Protein Intake from Various Foods Sources Is Negatively Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Markers in Italian Older Adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION HEALTH & AGING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12603-023-1981-2

Keywords

Nutrition; hypertension; diabetes; cardiovascular disease; elderly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the relationships between protein intake from different food sources and cardiometabolic risk markers in older Italian adults. The results suggest that the association between dietary protein and cardiometabolic risk factors depends on sex and the specific food sources.
ObjectivesTo examine the relationships between protein intake from various food sources and cardiometabolic risk markers in Italian older adults.DesignCross-sectional study. Setting: Unconventional settings across Italy (e.g., exhibitions, health promotion campaigns).ParticipantsPeople 65+ years who provided a written informed consent.MeasurementsBlood pressure (BP), blood glucose, total blood cholesterol, and anthropometric indices were assessed. Daily protein intake was estimated for 12 food items listed in a food frequency questionnaire.ResultsThree-thousand four-hundred twenty-four older adults (mean age: 72.7 & PLUSMN; 5.7 years; 55% women) were included in the study. Results of linear regression analysis indicated that protein intake from several food sources was negatively associated with BP, waist and hip circumferences, and waist-to-hip ratio in both sexes. Blood glucose levels were inversely associated with many protein sources in women. Positive associations were observed between some protein sources and total blood cholesterol in both men and women.ConclusionOur findings suggest that dietary protein is differentially associated with cardiometabolic risk factors depending on sex and food sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available