4.8 Article

Beyond price taker: Conceptual design and optimization of integrated energy systems using machine learning market surrogates

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 351, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121767

Keywords

Integrated energy systems; Surrogate modeling; Neural networks; Electricity markets; Energy infrastructure; Computational optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future electricity generation systems need to be optimized to provide flexibility against the variability of renewable energy sources and ensure the reliability of critical infrastructure like the electric grid. Current state-of-the-art is to optimize the design and operation of integrated energy systems (IES) using fixed parameters for electricity prices. However, recent research has shown the limitations of this approach, and this paper proposes a new optimization formulation that incorporates IES market interactions using machine learning surrogate models, resulting in more accurate predictions.
Future electricity generation systems must be optimized to provide flexibility that counteracts the variability of non-dispatchable renewable energy sources and ensures the reliability and safety of critical infrastructure, including the electric grid. The current state-of-the-art is to co-optimize the design and operation of integrated energy systems (IES) treating historical or predicted time-series electricity prices as fixed parameters. Recent literature has shown the limitations of this price taker assumption, which neglects how IES optimization decisions influence market outcomes. As such, this paper proposes a new optimization formulation that uses machine learning surrogate models, trained from a library of annual market operation simulations, to embed IES market interactions into the co-optimization problem directly. Using a thermal generator example built in the open-source IDAES computational environment, we show that the price taker approach routinely over predicts annual revenues by 8% or more compared to a validation simulation, where the proposed approach has a typical relative error of 1% or less.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available