4.1 Article

Clinical decision-making described by Swedish prehospital emergency care nurse students - An exploratory study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 46-50

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.10.006

Keywords

Prehospital emergency care; Ambulance; Education; Clinical rotation; Prehospital emergency care students; Decision-making

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: The purpose of this study was to explore the PECN students' clinical decision-making during a seven-week clinical rotation in the ambulance services. Introduction: Developing expertise in prehospital emergency care practices requires both theoretical and empirical learning. A prehospital emergency care nurse ( PECN) is a Registered Nurse ( RN) with one year of additional training in emergency care. There has been little investigation of how PECN students describe their decision-making during a clinical rotation. Methods: A qualitative study design was used, and 12 logbooks written by the Swedish PECN students were analysed using content analysis. Findings: The students wrote about 997 patient encounters - ambulance assignments during their clinical rotation. Four themes emerged as crucial for the students' decision-making: knowing the patient, the context-situation awareness in the ambulance service, collaboration, and evaluation. Based on the themes, students made decisions on how to respond to patients' illnesses. Conclusion: The PECN students used several variables in their decision-making. The decision-making was an on-going process during the whole ambulance assignment. The university has the responsibility to guide the students during their transition from an RN to a PECN. The findings of the study can support the educators and clinical supervisors in developing the programme of study for becoming a PECN. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available