4.6 Article

A separator coated with commercial LiFePO4 and conductive carbon for Li-S battery with good cycling performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 11, Issue 37, Pages 19870-19876

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ta03527a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Li-S batteries have high energy density, but issues like the 'shuttle effect' and lithium dendrites hinder their commercialization. This study prepares modified separators to address these issues, promoting better cycling performance and stability. It offers a feasible solution for high-performance Li-S batteries in commercial applications.
Li-S batteries can meet the demand of market development in terms of high energy density, but the notorious 'shuttle effect' and lithium dendrites pose a great threat to their cycling and safety performance, and greatly hinder their commercialization process. Under high sulfur loadings and high current densities, unsatisfactory cycling performances are also headache issues. Here, modified separators (SPLFPPD) with LiFePO4 (LFP) and Super P coating on the original separators (DKJ-14) are prepared to solve the above problems. The SPLFPPD has the advantages of a physical barrier to the polysulfides and promoting the catalytic conversion of polysulfides (S2- and sulfides). Besides, the SPLFPPD can enable the uniform deposition of lithium ions, increase ionic conductivities, and fully utilize active S substances. The capacity attenuation of the assembled Li-S batteries with the SPLFPPD is 0.062% per cycle at 1C after 800 cycles, and 0.045% per cycle at 5C after 1000 cycles. The specific capacity can be stable up to about 500 mA h g(-1) after 400 cycles at 0.2C with a high S loading of 4.0 mg cm(-2). After 100 cycles, no signs of corrosion or lithium dendrites were observed. This work provides a feasible way to prepare commercial separators for high-performance Li-S batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available