4.7 Article

Mechanisms and Stereoselectivities in the NHC-Catalyzed [4+2] Annulation of 2-Bromoenal and 6-Methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 88, Issue 18, Pages 12997-13008

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.3c01015

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic computational study was performed to disclose the reaction mechanism and selectivity in the NHC-catalyzed reaction of 2-bromoenal and 6-methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde. The catalytic cycle was found to consist of eight elementary steps, with the Bronsted acid playing a crucial role in proton transfer and decarboxylation. Addition to 6-methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde was identified as the determining factor for chemo- and stereoselectivity, with CH...N, CH...p, and LP...p interactions influencing the stereoselectivity.
To disclose the reaction mechanism and selectivity in the NHC-catalyzed reaction of 2-bromoenal and 6methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde, a systematic computational study has been performed. According to DFT computations, the catalytic cycle is divided into eight elementary steps: nucleophilic attack of the NHC on 2-bromoenal, 1,2-proton transfer, C-Br bond dissociation, 1,3-proton transfer, addition to 6-methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde, [2 + 2] cycloaddition, NHC dissociation, and decarboxylation. The Bronsted acid DABCO.H+ plays a crucial role in proton transfer and decarboxylation steps. The addition to 6methyluracil-5-carbaldehyde determines both chemoselectivity and stereoselectivity, leading to R-configured carbocycle-fused uracil, in agreement with experimental results. NCI analysis indicates that the CH...N, CH...p, and LP...p interactions should be the key factor for determining the stereoselectivity. ELF analysis shows the main role of the NHC in promoting C-Br bond dissociation. The mechanistic insights obtained in the present work may guide the rational design of potential NHC catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available