4.7 Article

Rill formation and evolution caused by upslope inflow and sediment deposition on freshly tilled loose surfaces

Journal

SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2023.105868

Keywords

Rill erosion; Inflow; Freshly tilled loose surfaces; Sediment yield

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the process of rill formation and evolution on tilled surfaces through flow scouring. The results show that the formation process can be divided into two stages, namely before and after the runoff reaches the downslope end. In the first stage, runoff washes soil particles and forms soil mounds, resulting in a curved rill and soil mounds on the surface. In the second stage, a rill channel is formed as the runoff reaches the downslope end. The morphology of the rill is influenced by the inflow rate, with rill depth and width increasing with ongoing headward erosion.
Rill erosion easily occurs on tilled surfaces because the soil shear resistance is less than the runoff shear stress. However, rill erosion formation and evolution on tilled surfaces under upslope inflow conditions remain unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the rill formation process and rill erosion amount on tilled surfaces via flow scouring under different inflow rates (4, 6, and 8 L min -1) at a 15 degrees slope. Close-range photogrammetric technology was applied to measure the rill morphology during the experiments. The results suggested that the rill formation process due to inflow could be divided into two distinct stages, namely, before and after runoff reached the downslope end, i.e., stages I and II, respectively. At stage I, runoff washed soil particles along the downslope direction. In this process, due to limited transport capacity of runoff, washed soil particles were deposited at the runoff head and formed a soil mound, which blocked the flow path, after which the runoff direction changed within the 6.7 degrees- 50.6 degrees range with an average moving distance of 0.62 m. As a result, a curved rill and a series of soil mounds were left on the surface. The inflow rate affected rill morphology by influencing the runoff direction change angle and runoff moving distance between the mounds on the surface. Herein, the rill formation process is referred to as downslope-trending erosion by inflow (DTEI). At stage II, runoff reached the downslope end, and a rill channel was formed throughout the slope. Thereafter, DTEI was largely reduced, and headward erosion was strengthened. As a result, the rill morphology quickly changed, such as the rill depth and rill width, which gradually increased with ongoing headward erosion. During DTEI, the rill paths were curved due to sediment deposition, and the sediment deposition conditions varied under the different inflow rates. Therefore, the rill curvature (RC) differed (1.039 & PLUSMN; 0.014). The RC decreased with headward erosion progression at stage II. The total sediment yield (TSY) increased with increasing inflow rate. Under inflow rates ranging from 4 to 6 L min- 1 and 6-8 L min -1, the TSY increased 2.1-2.4 times. Consequently, DTEI on tilled surfaces significantly affects the initial rill morphology and evolution at the later stage. Hence, on slopes, its role should be considered in rill erosion assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available