4.7 Article

A silica-related matrix effect on NanoSIMS Li isotopic analysis of glasses and its online calibration

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL ATOMIC SPECTROMETRY
Volume 38, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3ja00100h

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate Li isotope analysis of silicate glasses using SIMS is challenging due to the matrix effect. This study presents Li isotopic measurements on a set of silicate glasses and proposes a correction method to improve accuracy.
Accurate Li isotope analysis of silicate glasses using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is challenging due to the matrix effect, which causes instrumental mass fractionation (IMF). The characteristics of the matrix effect vary for each element, necessitating empirical correction methods. Here, we present Li isotopic measurements on a set of silicate glasses spanning a broad compositional range from ultramafic to highly siliceous using a Cameca NanoSIMS 50L. A radio-frequency (RF)-O primary beam with an intensity of 1 nA was rastered over a 5 x 5 mu m(2) area on the sample, and the secondary ions Li-6, Li-7 and Si-30 were simultaneously detected. We observed a significant matrix effect on delta Li-7 in the silicate glasses, which yielded an IMF of up to 19&, exceeding the analytical precision of <2.5& (1SD). The IMF is strongly correlated with the chemical compositions of the silicate glasses. To correct the matrix effect, we employed various correction schemes, including univariate and multivariable compositions. All results consistently indicated that silica exerted a dominant influence on the IMF. We then propose a straightforward online method to correct this silica-related matrix effect by utilizing simultaneously measured Si-30 signals. This strategy improves the accuracy of the Li isotope measurements to within 3(0)/(00) and can be widely applied to anhydrous subalkaline magmatic glasses with compositions ranging from ultramafic to highly siliceous.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available