4.1 Article

Comparison of Force During the Endotracheal Intubation of Commercial Simulation Manikins

Journal

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43808

Keywords

experienced clinicians; cormack-lehane grade; video laryngoscopy (vl); intubation force; intubation simulation; simulation trainer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the laryngoscopy force required for endotracheal intubation using three commercially available simulation manikins in both normal and difficult airway scenarios. The results show significant variability in laryngoscopy force among the manikins, as well as differences in the force required for intubation between normal and difficult airway scenarios. Experienced clinicians rated the Gaumard manikin as the most realistic in terms of force applied during intubation.
Background Medical simulation allows clinicians to safely practice the procedural skill of endotracheal intubation. Applied force to oropharyngeal structures increases the risk of patient harm, and video laryngoscopy (VL) requires less force to obtain a glottic view. It is unknown how much force is required to obtain a glottic view using commercially available simulation manikins and if variability exists. This study compares laryngoscopy force for a modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade I view in both normal and difficult airway scenarios between three commercially available simulation manikins. Methods Experienced clinicians (>= 2 years experience) were recruited to participate from critical care, emergency medicine, and anesthesia specialties. A C-MAC size 3 VL blade was equipped with five force resistor reading (FSR) sensors (four concave surfaces, one convex), measuring resistance (Ohms) in response to applied pressure (1-100 Newtons). The study occurred in a university simulation lab. Using a randomized sequence, 49 physicians performed intubations on three manikins (Laerdal SimMan 3GPlus, Gaumard Hal S3201, CAE Apollo) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. The outcomes were sensor mean pressure, peak force, and CL grade. Summary statistics were calculated. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) conducted for both scenarios assessed changes in pressure measured in three manikins while accounting for correlated responses of individuals assigned in random order. Paired t-test assessed for the in-manikin difference between scenarios. STATA/BE v17 (R) was used for analysis; results interpreted at type I error alpha is 0.05. Results Participants included 49 experienced clinicians. Mean years' experience was 4(+/- 6.6); median prior intubations were 80 (IQR 50-400). Mean individual sensor pressure varied within scenarios depending on manikin (p<0.001). Higher mean forces were used in difficult scenarios (603.4 +/- 128.9, 611.1 +/- 101.4, 467.5 +/- 72.4 FSR) than normal ( 462.5 +/- 121.9, 596.0 +/- 90.5, 290.6 +/- 63.2 FSR) for each manikin (p<0.001). All manikins required more peak force in the difficult scenario (p<0.03). The highest mean forces (Laerdal, CAE, difficult scenario) were associated with the higher frequency of grade 2A views (p<0.001). The Gaumard manikin was rated most realistic in terms of force required to intubate. Conclusion Commercially available high-fidelity manikins had significant variability in laryngoscopy force in both normal and difficult airway scenarios. In difficult airway scenarios, significant variability existed in CL grade between manikin brands. Experienced clinicians rated Gaumard Hal as the most realistic force applied during endotracheal intubation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available