4.7 Article

Short-Term Wind Speed or Power Forecasting With Heteroscedastic Support Vector Regression

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 241-249

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2015.2480245

Keywords

Gaussian noise (GN); heteroscedasticity; support vector regression (SVR); wind speed forecasting

Funding

  1. National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) [2012CB215201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61432011, 61222210, 61170107, 61105054, 61300121]
  3. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0399]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wind speed or wind power forecasting plays an important role in large-scale wind power penetration due to their uncertainty. Support vector regression, widely used in wind speed or wind power forecasting, aims at discovering natural structures of wind variation hidden in historical data. Most current regression algorithms, including least squares support vector regression (SVR), assume that the noise of the data is Gaussian with zero mean and the same variance. However, it is discovered that the uncertainty of short-term wind speed satisfies Gaussian distribution with zero mean and heteroscedasticity in this work. This kind of task is called heteroscedastic regression. In order to deal with this problem, we derive an optimal loss function for heteroscedastic regression and develop a new framework of nu-SVR for learning tasks of Gaussian noise (GN) with heteroscedasticity. In addition, we introduce the stochastic gradient descent (SGD) method to solve the proposed model, which leads the models to be trained online. Finally, we reveal the uncertainty properties of wind speed with two real-world datasets and test the proposed algorithms on these data. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available