4.4 Article

Isolation and characterization of potential Lactobacillus acidophilus strains isolated from pig feces

Journal

ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/asj.13869

Keywords

antibiotics; characterization; identification; lactic acid bacteria; resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to isolate and characterize Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from pig farm feces samples and evaluate their potential as oral probiotic candidates. The results showed that most LAB had good resistance to low pH and bile salts, as well as demonstrated survival in simulated gastrointestinal conditions. Some isolates also exhibited antimicrobial activities.
The aim of this study was to isolate and characterize Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) from 16 feces samples of pig farm, and to evaluate the probiotic potential of these isolates as potential oral probiotic candidates. The selection process was based on the isolation, identification, and a series of experiments for the selection of appropriate candidates with beneficial properties. The results demonstrated that most of LAB showed relatively strong resistance to pH 2.5 and high bile salts (1%), and had good survival in simulated gastric and intestinal juice. 9 isolates displayed antimicrobial activities against Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter sakazakii. Almost all isolates were sensitive to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, vancomycin and amoxicillin, and most of isolates exhibited resistance against tetracycline and vancomycin. The adhesion rates of LAB varied greatly. The results of the study suggested that the Lactobacillus acidophilus NCUA065001 have the important functional property of probiotic candidates to enhance gut integrity and could considered to be the potential antibiotic alternatives in the pig feed industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available