4.7 Article

Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Stochastic Optimization With Robust Aggregation Rules

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 3179-3195

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2023.3300629

Keywords

Decentralized network; stochastic optimization; Byzantine attacks; robust aggregation rule

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article focuses on decentralized stochastic optimization in the presence of Byzantine attacks. It discusses the issues with existing robust aggregation rules in a decentralized scenario and provides guidelines for designing favorable Byzantine-resilient algorithms. The article proposes a new aggregation rule called iterative outlier scissor (IOS) and demonstrates its effectiveness through numerical experiments.
This article focuses on decentralized stochastic optimization in the presence of Byzantine attacks. During the optimization process, an unknown number of malfunctioning or malicious workers, termed as Byzantine workers, disobey the algorithmic protocol and send arbitrarily wrong messages to their neighbors. Even though various Byzantine-resilient algorithms have been developed for distributed stochastic optimization with a central server, we show that there are two major issues in the existing robust aggregation rules when being applied to the decentralized scenario: disagreement and non-doubly stochastic virtual mixing matrix. This article provides comprehensive analysis that discloses the negative effects of these two issues, and gives guidelines of designing favorable Byzantine-resilient decentralized stochastic optimization algorithms. Under these guidelines, we propose iterative outlier scissor (IOS), an iterative filtering-based robust aggregation rule with provable performance guarantees. Numerical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of IOS. The code of simulation implementation is available at github.com/Zhaoxian-Wu/IOS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available