4.4 Article

Modeling the structure of the transmembrane domain of T1R3, a subunit of the sweet taste receptor, with neohesperidin dihydrochalcone using molecular dynamics simulation

Journal

BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 87, Issue 12, Pages 1470-1477

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bbb/zbad133

Keywords

sweet taste receptor; neohesperidin dihydrochalcone; molecular dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study created a docked model of the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the T1R3 subunit of the human sweet taste receptor with neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) and identified important residues for NHDC recognition. The docking mode of NHDC with T1R3 TMD was distinct from that of lactisole, a sweet taste inhibitor.
Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC) is a sweetener, which interacts with the transmembrane domain (TMD) of the T1R3 subunit of the human sweet taste receptor. Although NHDC and a sweet taste inhibitor lactisole share similar structural motifs, they have opposite effects on the receptor. This study involved the creation of an NHDC-docked model of T1R3 TMD through mutational analyses followed by in silico simulations. When certain NHDC derivatives were docked to the model, His7345.44 was demonstrated to play a crucial role in activating T1R3 TMD. The NHDC-docked model was then compared with a lactisole-docked inactive form, several residues were characterized as important for the recognition of NHDC; however, most of them were distinct from those of lactisole. Residues such as His6413.33 and Gln7947.38 were found to be oriented differently. This study provides useful information that will facilitate the design of sweeteners and inhibitors that interact with T1R3 TMD. Graphical Abstract A neohesperidin dihydrochalcone docked model of transmembrane domain of T1R3 subunit of the human sweet taste receptor based on results of mutational analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available