4.8 Review

Immunochromatographic enhancement strategy for SARS-CoV-2 detection based on nanotechnology

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 15, Issue 37, Pages 15092-15107

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d3nr02396f

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review explores methods to improve the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection through immunochromatography based on nanotechnology. It provides an overview of these methods and their performance, while addressing the challenges in COVID-19 diagnosis through lateral flow immunoassay.
The global outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been catastrophic to both human health and social development. Therefore, developing highly reliable and sensitive point-of-care testing (POCT) for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has become a priority. Among all available POCTs, the lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA, also known as immunochromatography) has proved to be effective due to its accuracy, portability, convenience, and speed. In areas with a scarcity of laboratory resources and medical personnel, the LFIA provides an affordable option for the diagnosis of COVID-19. This review offers a comprehensive overview of methods for improving the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection using immunochromatography based on nanotechnology, sorted according to the different detection targets (antigens, antibodies, and nucleic acids). It also looks into the performance and properties of the various sensitivity enhancement strategies, before delving into the remaining challenges in COVID-19 diagnosis through LFIA. Ultimately, it seeks to provide helpful guidance in selecting an appropriate strategy for SARS-CoV-2 immunochromatographic detection based on nanotechnology. This review summarizes new methods for improving the sensitivity of immunochromatographic SARS-CoV-2 detection based on nanotechnology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available