4.7 Article

Characterization and estimation of the bioaccessibility of essential elements in organic milk by INFOGEST protocol

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 433, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137327

Keywords

Minerals; Digestibility; Organic dairy; In vitro digestion; Nutrition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study estimated the bioaccessibility of calcium, phosphorus and magnesium in organic milk and conventional milk using an in vitro protocol. The results showed that organic milk and conventional milk had similar protein content, but organic milk had lower lactose and lipid content. Among different brands and batches, organic milk had higher sodium levels and lower potassium and phosphorus levels, while calcium levels were higher and there were no differences in magnesium levels. Organic milk showed the highest bioaccessible calcium values and phosphorus had the highest bioaccessibility in conventional milk.
The study estimated the bioaccessibility of calcium, phosphorus and magnesium in organic milk (ORG), compared to conventional (CNV) by the INFOGEST in vitro protocol. Total proteins, lipids and lactose were evaluated, the determination of essential minerals was performed by FAAS and phosphorus by colorimetric method. All ORG samples showed protein content equivalent to CNV and lower lactose and lipid content. Within different brands and batches, two batches of ORG presented higher levels of Na and lower levels of K and P, while all batches showed higher values for Ca and no differences for Mg. The bioaccessibility of magnesium was greater than 60%. ORG showed the highest values of bioaccessible calcium (12-65%) against CNV (11-27%). Phosphorus showed bioaccessibility higher than 74% in CNV. The variability of the results was related to different factors inherent to the matrices, such as casein and fatty-acids content and electrolytes standardized in the protocol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available