4.6 Article

A Multiobjective Genetic Programming-Based Ensemble for Simultaneous Feature Selection and Classification

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 499-510

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2404806

Keywords

Classification; ensemble; feature selection (FS); genetic programming (GP)

Funding

  1. INSPIRE Fellowship through Department of Science and Technology, India [IF120686]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present an integrated algorithm for simultaneous feature selection (FS) and designing of diverse classifiers using a steady state multiobjective genetic programming (GP), which minimizes three objectives: 1) false positives (FPs); 2) false negatives (FNs); and 3) the number of leaf nodes in the tree. Our method divides a c-class problem into c binary classification problems. It evolves c sets of genetic programs to create c ensembles. During mutation operation, our method exploits the fitness as well as unfitness of features, which dynamically change with generations with a view to using a set of highly relevant features with low redundancy. The classifiers of ith class determine the net belongingness of an unknown data point to the ith class using a weighted voting scheme, which makes use of the FP and FN mistakes made on the training data. We test our method on eight microarray and 11 text data sets with diverse number of classes (from 2 to 44), large number of features (from 2000 to 49 151), and high feature-to-sample ratio (from 1.03 to 273.1). We compare our method with a bi-objective GP scheme that does not use any FS and rule size reduction strategy. It depicts the effectiveness of the proposed FS and rule size reduction schemes. Furthermore, we compare our method with four classification methods in conjunction with six features selection algorithms and full feature set. Our scheme performs the best for 380 out of 474 combinations of data sets, algorithm and FS method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available