3.8 Article

Nanocomposite based Electrochemical Sensors for Determination of Some Biologically Important Compounds: A Review

Journal

ANALYTICAL & BIOANALYTICAL ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 668-695

Publisher

UNIV TEHRAN, FAC CHEMISTRY, CENTER EXCELLENCE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.22034/abec.2023.707326

Keywords

-Electrochemical nanosensors; Drug analysis; Cyclic voltammetry; Biochemicals; Nanocomposites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical methods have gained popularity in the pharmaceutical and drug analysis sectors due to their benefits of high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. Recent developments in electrochemical sensors for drug analysis emphasize the need for standardized methods and multiplexed sensors.
Electrochemical methods have become increasingly popular in the pharmaceutical and drug analysis sectors due to their numerous benefits, such as high sensitivity, selectivity, and specificity. Electrochemical-based nanomaterials are adjustable and can be influenced by the type of electrode used and the applied potential. Electroanalytical methods have proven to be a useful analytical technology that has seen increased utility in the pharmaceutical business in recent years. In the last five years, there have been significant developments in the synthesis and use of novel electrochemical sensors in drug analysis. These developments have been driven by advancements in instrumentation and an increased understanding of electrochemical methods. This review concludes the current state-of-the-art in electrochemical sensors for pharmaceutical analysis and future perspectives in this field. We highlight the need for more standardized methods for the determination of biologically important compounds such as dopamine, guanine, adenine, and uric acid using electrochemical sensors and the development of multiplexed sensors for simultaneous analysis of multiple drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available