4.5 Article

Diverticular disease in Scotland: 2000-2010

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 329-334

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12811

Keywords

Diverticulosis; treatment; morbidity; mortality; epidemiology

Funding

  1. Shire
  2. MRC [MC_PC_U127527198] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127527198] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimSymptomatic diverticular disease (DD) may be increasing in incidence in western society particularly in younger age groups. This study aimed to describe hospital admission rates and management for DD in Scotland between 2000 and 2010. MethodData were obtained from the Scottish Morbidity Records (SMR01). The study cohort included all patients with a hospital admission and a primary diagnosis of DD of the large intestine (ICD-10 primary code K57). ResultsScottish NHS hospitals reported 90990 admissions for DD (in 87314 patients) from 2000 to 2010. The annual number of admissions increased by 55.2% from 6591 in 2000 to 10,228 in 2010, an average annual increase per year of 4.5%. Most of the increase attributable to DD was due to elective day cases (3618 in 2000; 6925 in 2010) a likely consequence of a greater proportion of the population accessing colonoscopy over that time period. There was an 11% increase in inpatient admissions (2973-3303), 60% of these patients being women. Admissions in younger age groups increased proportionally in the later years of the study, and there was an association between DD admissions and greater deprivation. Despite an increase in complicated DD from 22.9% in 2000 to 27.1% in 2010 and a 16.8% increase in emergency inpatient admissions, the rate of surgery fell during the period of study. ConclusionThis report supports findings of other population-based studies of western countries indicating that DD is an increasing burden on health service resources, particularly in younger age groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available