4.6 Article

Improved Patch-Based Automated Liver Lesion Classification by Separate Analysis of the Interior and Boundary Regions

Journal

IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1585-1594

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2478255

Keywords

Automated diagnosis; computed tomography; classification; focal liver lesions; image patch analysis; visualwords

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [U01-CA-142555, U01-CA-190214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The bag-of-visual-words (BoVW) method with construction of a single dictionary of visual words has been used previously for a variety of classification tasks in medical imaging, including the diagnosis of liver lesions. In this paper, we describe a novel method for automated diagnosis of liver lesions in portal-phase computed tomography (CT) images that improves over single-dictionary BoVW methods by using an image patch representation of the interior and boundary regions of the lesions. Our approach captures characteristics of the lesion margin and of the lesion interior by creating two separate dictionaries for the margin and the interior regions of lesions (dual dictionaries of visual words). Based on these dictionaries, visual word histograms are generated for each region of interest within the lesion and its margin. For validation of our approach, we used two datasets from two different institutions, containing CT images of 194 liver lesions (61 cysts, 80 metastasis, and 53 hemangiomas). The final diagnosis of each lesion was established by radiologists. The classification accuracy for the images from the two institutions was 99% and 88%, respectively, and 93% for a combined dataset. Our new BoVW approach that uses dual dictionaries shows promising results. We believe the benefits of our approach may generalize to other application domains within radiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available