4.7 Article

Experimental and numerical study on the fatigue behaviour of the shot-earth 772

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107922

Keywords

Cyclic tests; Fatigue behaviour; Micromechanical numerical model; Shot-earth; S-N curves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research work focuses on the experimental characterization of the mechanical, fracture, and fatigue properties of shot-earth 772, with a special emphasis on its fatigue behavior. Experimental tests including flexural and compression tests, three-point bending fracture tests, and bending and compression cyclic tests were conducted. A finite element numerical model was used to simulate the cyclic tests and validate the input data through the fracture tests. The accuracy of the model was demonstrated by comparing the numerical fatigue lifetimes with the corresponding experimental results. Contours of the damage parameter and reduced Young modulus were plotted to illustrate the evolution of fatigue damage.
The present research work is devoted to the mechanical, fracture and fatigue experimental characterization of the shot-earth 772, with a particular attention to its fatigue behaviour. To such an aim, an extensive experimental program has been carried out, consisting of: (i) flexural and compression tests, (ii) three-point bending fracture tests, and (iii) bending and compression cyclic tests. Moreover, a FE numerical model is employed to simulate both the above bending and compression cyclic tests, after the input data validation performed by simulating the above fracture tests. The numerical fatigue lifetimes are compared with the corresponding experimental ones for both pulsating bending and compression, highlighting the model accuracy. Finally, the contours of both the damage parameter and the reduced Young modulus are plotted showing the evolution of fatigue damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available