4.7 Article

A Developmental Transcriptome Map for Allotetraploid Arachis hypogaea

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01446

Keywords

transcriptomics; Arachis hypogaea; developmental co-expression networks; homeolog expression bias; alternative splicing; non-coding RNA; PRJNA291488

Categories

Funding

  1. Peanut Foundation
  2. National Peanut Board
  3. Georgia Peanut Commission
  4. Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2012-85117-19435]
  5. MARs [58-6402-2-723]
  6. Peanut Genome Initiative
  7. NIFA [578715, 2012-85117-19435] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The advent of the genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis has ushered in a new era for peanut genomics. With the goal of producing a gene atlas for cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea), 22 different tissue types and ontogenies that represent the full development of peanut were sequenced, including a complete reproductive series from flower to peg elongation and peg tip immersion in the soil to fully mature seed. Using a genome-guided assembly pipeline, a homeolog-specific transcriptome assembly for Arachis hypogaea was assembled and its accuracy was validated. The assembly was used to annotate 21 developmental co-expression networks as tools for gene discovery. Using a set of 8816 putative homeologous gene pairs, homeolog expression bias was documented, and although bias was mostly balanced, there were striking differences in expression bias in a tissue-specific context. Over 9000 alterative splicing events and over 6000 non-coding RNAs were further identified and profiled in a developmental context. Together, this work represents a major new resource for cultivated peanut and will be integrated into peanutbase.org as an available resource for all peanut researchers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available