4.0 Article

Vital pulp therapy following pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth with carious exposure

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 65-72

Publisher

MRE PRESS
DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.054

Keywords

Vital pulp therapy; Pulpotomy; Immature permanent teeth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy using iRoot BP Plus for immature permanent teeth and assessed the impact of preoperative factors on treatment success. The results showed that this treatment method was highly effective for patients aged 6 to 10 years with pulp exposure due to dental caries.
This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of vital pulp therapy (VPT) with the use of iRoot BP Plus (Innovative Bioceramics, Vancouver, Canada) for immature permanent teeth of patients aged from 6 to 10 years with pulp exposure resulting from dental caries and determine the impact of preoperative factors on VPT. Forty-six immature permanent teeth with dental caries underwent pulpotomy using iRoot BP Plus following a standardized protocol. Postoperative follow-ups were conducted on the first 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery, then annually afterward. Successful treatment outcomes were defined based on clinical and radiographic evaluations. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test, with p < 0.05 considered for statistical significance. Forty-four patients included in this study were 8.48 +/- 1.49 years old and were followed up for 6 to 36 months. The overall success rate of pulpotomy was found to be 90.9% (40/44). None of the physical examination findings and symptoms significantly affected VPT prognosis (p > 0.05). Immature permanent teeth with caries-induced pulp exposed in patients aged 6 to 10 years can be effectively treated with pulpotomy using iRoot sBP Plus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available