4.7 Article

BubbleMask: Autonomous visualization of digital flow bubbles for predicting critical heat flux

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124656

Keywords

Flow boiling; Digital bubbles; Microgravity; Computer vision; Autonomous feature extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes computer vision techniques and models to extract physical features of bubbles in flow boiling and predicts critical heat flux based on these features. This vision-based approach has the potential to revolutionize the study of thermofluidics by providing visual insights that agree with experimental data.
Flow boiling utilizes the latent heat of the fluid to provide an efficient thermal management solution through bubble-induced advective transport. In microgravity environments, flow boiling becomes even more advantageous as macroscale flow helps efficiently remove bubbles from the heated wall, resulting in enhancing heat transfer as well as critical heat flux (CHF). However, connecting flow boiling physics and bubble information is a challenging task due to the complexity and high dimensionality of bubble dynamics. To overcome this challenge, the advances in computer vision techniques and models such as VISION-iT can be leveraged to autonomously extract physically meaningful features related to spatial statistics, interfacial characteristics, and bubble dynamics by digitalizing flow bubble information. In this study, 30,000 flow boiling images under microgravity conditions are used to compute ten different features of 155,000 individual bubbles. The extracted bubble information is then used to predict CHF by using a classical flow boiling model, the Interfacial Lift-off Model. This vision-based approach suggested here has the potential to revolutionize the study of such thermofluidic topics by providing visual insights that agree well with experimental data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available