4.7 Article

Machine learning approach to predicting the hysteresis of water retention curves of porous media

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 237, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121469

Keywords

Water retention hysteresis; Boundary wetting curve; Boundary drying curve; Machine learning; k-nearest-neighbors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a machine learning modeling approach is developed to predict the hysteretic Boundary Drying curves of unsaturated porous media based on known Boundary Wetting curves. The proposed approach allows continuous updating of the model using new measured data and shows good agreement between predicted and measured curves.
In this study, we develop a machine learning modeling approach to the prediction of the hysteretic Boundary Drying (BD) curves of unsaturated porous media from the known Boundary Wetting (BW) curves, measured at a constant void ratio. The relationship between the families of BW and BD curves of the porous media is considered to consist of regular and random constituents, and it is represented by a limited set of N known pairs of these curves. Prediction of the desired BD curve from its associated known BW curve of some porous medium is obtained as a product of two mappings: (i) a nonlinear mapping of the known BW curve to its corresponding Hypothetical Drying (HD) curve, as defined in The modified dependent-domain theory of hysteresis of Mualem (1984, 2009) and (ii) a linear mapping of this HD curve to the desired BD curve. The latter mapping is performed by an optimization algorithm based on a training set of k known BW-BD pairs (k <= N) of the k corresponding porous media. The predicted BD curves indicate a generally good agreement with the measured ones. An advantage of the proposed approach is the possibility of permanently updating the suggested model by incorporating new measured data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available