4.7 Article

Occurrence of antibiotics in reclaimed water, and their uptake dynamics, phytotoxicity, and metabolic fate in Lolium perenne L.

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 904, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166975

Keywords

Reclaimed water; Antibiotics; Ryegrass; Bioaccumulation and biomagnification; Metabolic fate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the occurrence and toxicity of antibiotics in reclaimed water and their fate in plants. The findings showed that antibiotics in reclaimed water had negative effects on the growth of plants. Ryegrass was found to effectively remove antibiotics through biodegradation processes.
Reclaimed water (RW) has been extensively used for irrigation in agriculture, yet the occurrence of antibiotics in real RW, and their toxicity, uptake dynamics and metabolic fate still needs comprehensive exploration. In this study, we investigated the residual concentrations of nineteen antibiotics in the RW from four wastewater treatment plants, and determined their toxicity on plant at environment-relevant concentration. Total found concentrations of these antibiotics ranged from 623.66 ng L-1 to 1536.96 ng L-1, which decreased 10.3 and 19.4 % of roots' length and weight. Uptake dynamics analysis of the most hazardous antibiotic, norfloxacin (NFX) showed increasing amounts in the roots and leaves up to 3087.71 mu g g(- 1). Ryegrass also can remove >80 % of 100 mu g L-1 NFX being achieved by biodegradation through ring cleavage, decarboxylation, defluorination, hydrogenation, methylation and oxidation. Toxicity assessment of the identified byproducts showed their more toxic effect on fish, daphnia and algae. This study extended our understanding of the fate of antibiotics in plants during irrigation with reclaimed water, and emphasized its safety and pollutants' biomagnification concerns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available