3.8 Article

Phase shift between joint rotation and actuation reflects dominant forces and predicts muscle activation patterns

Journal

PNAS NEXUS
Volume 2, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad298

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new dimensionless number to express the effects of gravitational, inertial, elastic, and viscous forces on behavior control. By combining this number with limb length and cycle period, it can explain and predict the electromyographic patterns of animals during walking.
During behavior, the work done by actuators on the body can be resisted by the body's inertia, elastic forces, gravity, or viscosity. The dominant forces that resist actuation have major consequences on the control of that behavior. In the literature, features and actuation of locomotion, for example, have been successfully predicted by nondimensional numbers (e.g. Froude number and Reynolds number) that generally express the ratio between two of these forces (gravitational, inertial, elastic, and viscous). However, animals of different sizes or motions at different speeds may not share the same dominant forces within a behavior, making ratios of just two of these forces less useful. Thus, for a broad comparison of behavior across many orders of magnitude of limb length and cycle period, a dimensionless number that includes gravitational, inertial, elastic, and viscous forces is needed. This study proposes a nondimensional number that relates these four forces: the phase shift (phi) between the displacement of the limb and the actuator force that moves it. Using allometric scaling laws, phi for terrestrial walking is expressed as a function of the limb length and the cycle period at which the limb steps. Scale-dependent values of phi are used to explain and predict the electromyographic (EMG) patterns employed by different animals as they walk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available