4.7 Article

Event-triggered boundary consensus control for multi-agent systems of fractional reaction-diffusion PDEs

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107538

Keywords

Multi-agent systems of fractional RDPDEs; Finite-time consensus; Event-triggered boundary control; Well-posedness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the distributed consensus problem in multi-agent systems using fractional reaction-diffusion partial differential equations. Two novel event-triggered boundary control schemes are proposed based on Lyapunov technique and linear matrix inequalities theory to achieve consensus. The effectiveness of the control performance is verified through an example.
The distributed consensus is considered for multi-agent systems (MASs), which char-acterized by fractional reaction-diffusion partial differential equations (RDPDEs) in this paper. Based on Lyapunov technique and linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) theory, the consensus can be realized via two novel event-triggered boundary control schemes. Firstly, a novel convergence principle subject to finite time is presented for the con-tinuously differentiable function. Secondly, the cooling fin on surface of high-speed aerospace vehicle is remodeled by fractional RDPDEs system, and the well-posedness of presented system is discussed applying the monotone iterative approach. Thirdly, according to the presented static event-triggered boundary control strategy, the con-sensus criterion in finite time is addressed in the form of LMIs, in addition, the settling time is calculated accurately. Applying the dynamic event-triggered control protocol, the Mittag-Leffler (M-L) consensus condition is achieved. Moreover, the Zeno behaviors are ruled out for proposed event-triggered mechanisms. Finally, the high-speed aerospace vehicle model is presented to verify the effectiveness of the control performance.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available