4.7 Article

An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Approach to Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Network Target Assignment in Three-Dimensional Scenarios

Journal

MATHEMATICS
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/math11194196

Keywords

multiple unmanned aerial vehicles; evolutionary game theory; target assignment; replicator equation; evidence theory

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a method for target assignment in three-dimensional scenarios based on evolutionary game theory, to enhance the operational efficiency and achieve maximum utility for multi-UAVs.
Target assignment has been a hot topic of research in the academic and industrial communities for swarms of multiple unmanned aerial vehicle (multi-UAVs). Traditional methods mainly focus on cooperative target assignment in planes, and they ignore three-dimensional scenarios for the multi-UAV network target assignment problem. This paper proposes a method for target assignment in three-dimensional scenarios based on evolutionary game theory to achieve cooperative targeting for multi-UAVs, significantly improving operational efficiency and achieving maximum utility. Firstly, we construct an evolutionary game model including game participants, a tactical strategy space, a payoff matrix, and a strategy selection probability space. Then, a multi-level information fusion algorithm is designed to evaluate the overall attack effectiveness of multi-UAVs against multiple targets. The replicator equation is leveraged to obtain the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) and dynamically update the optimal strategy. Finally, a typical scenario analysis and an effectiveness experiment are carried out on the RflySim platform to analyze the calculation process and verify the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results show that the proposed method can effectively provide a target assignment solution for multi-UAVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available