4.7 Article

A targeted foodomic approach to assess differences in extra virgin olive oils: Effects of storage, agronomic and technological factors

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 435, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137539

Keywords

Secoiridoids; Bioactive compounds; Olive oil stability; SPME-GC-MS; UPLC-MS/MS; Sensory analysis; Volatile profile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of olive maturity, malaxation time/temperature, and oil storage on the quality and composition of Arbequina EVOO. Storage conditions were found to be the most influential factor, followed by olive maturity and malaxation temperature. Storage at room temperature significantly affected the phenolic profile and quality parameters. Volatile compounds and fatty acids were good indicators of olive ripeness.
Extra virgin olive oil (EVOO) quality and composition are mainly affected by genetics, agronomic and technological parameters, undergoing further modifications during storage. In this work, a chemometric approach was applied to study the impact of olive maturity, malaxation time/temperature, and oil storage on the quality and compositional parameters of Arbequina EVOO (basic quality indices, volatile and sensory profiles, contents in phenolic compounds, squalene, vitamin E and fatty acids). Storage emerged as the most influential factor, followed by olive maturity and malaxation temperature, while malaxation time had almost no effect. Storage at room temperature had a significant impact on the phenolic profile and quality parameters, mainly the peroxide value and K270. The determination of K270, an indicator of secondary oxidation products, was relevant to analyze the effect of storage conditions. Volatile compounds and fatty acids were good markers of ripeness, and the volatile profile was highly affected by malaxation temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available