4.7 Article

Sample plot design can affect the efficiency and accuracy of shrub coverage measurements in shrub-encroached grasslands

Journal

CATENA
Volume 233, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107533

Keywords

Fraction of shrub coverage; Line-point intercept method; Normalized difference vegetation index; Sample plot design; Unmanned aerial vehicle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Shrub encroachment is a global concern, and the fraction of shrub coverage (FSC) is an important indicator. The commonly used line-point intercept (LPI) method for FSC measurement in field surveys has issues of poor accuracy and low measurement efficiency. This study focuses on Caragana microphylla shrub-encroached grassland and uses normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to derive actual FSC values and simulate measurements using the LPI method. The results show significant systematic errors in measurements from circular plots and suggest that achieving an efficient measurement in square plots requires considering different coverage levels, ensuring an adequate number of lines, and setting a relatively smaller point spacing.
Shrub encroachment has become a global concern. The fraction of shrub coverage (FSC) is an important indicator that reflects the distribution of shrubs and the degree of shrub encroachment in grasslands. The line-point intercept (LPI) method is commonly used for FSC measurement in field surveys, but it's often associated with issues of poor accuracy and low measurement efficiency. Here, we focus on Caragana microphylla shrubencroached grassland as a case study. We used normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data obtained from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to derive the actual values of FSC (FSCT) and to simulate measurements using the LPI method. We compared the results for measurements based on different sample plot designs, including variation in plot shape and line distribution, the number of sample lines, and the sample point spacings. The aim was to investigate the influence of these main parameters of sample plot design upon measurement results, in order to provide a reference for FSC measurements in field experiments. We first calculated FSCT and stratified the plots according to coverage levels. Based on this, we further evaluated the measurement accuracy of the LPI method under different parameter settings. The results revealed significant systematic errors in the measurement from circular plots. For square plots, the minimum number of lines required for the high, medium, and low coverage groups are 48, 16, and 8 (for 80% accuracy), and likewise, 108, 24, and 16 (for 90% accuracy), respectively. Futuremore, point spacings of 0.1 m and 0.5 m can achieve the same accuracy as the original spacing (0.02 m). We conclude that the systematic errors in circular plots are caused by the radial distribution of lines, whereas in square plots, achieving an efficient measurement requires considering different coverage levels, ensuring an adequate number of lines, and setting a relatively smaller point spacing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available