4.7 Article

Conversion of archeological iron rust employing coconut husk lignin

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126786

Keywords

Coconut husk; Soda lignin; Organosolv lignin; Archeological iron; Rust converter; Rust transformation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rust powder collected from an archeological iron was evaluated through complementary analyses. Lepidocrocite was identified as the major component. The lignin extracted from coconut husk showed potential as an environmentally friendly alternative, with soda lignin displaying superior antioxidant capabilities compared to organosolv lignin. The rust conversion study found that 5 wt% of soda lignin achieved the highest conversion rate.
Rust powder collected from an archeological iron was evaluated by complementary analyses such as FTIR, XRD, XRF, and SEM/EDX. The analyses revealed that lepidocrocite (L) was the major component in the archeological iron. Coconut husk (CH) can be classified as a type of lignocellulosic biomass of renewable resources that are widely available, especially in coastal areas. In this research, the isolated lignin extracted from CH is being studied as a potential alternative for environmentally friendly applications. The isolated lignin from soda and organosolv pulping went through several analyses such as FTIR, NMR (13C and 2D-HSQC), and TGA analyses. The analyses showed that lignin isolated via soda pulping has superior antioxidant capabilities due to its greater phenolic-OH content compared to lignin isolated from organosolv pulping. The effects of lignin concentrations, pH, and reaction time were utilized in rust conversion studies of an archeological iron. 5 wt% of soda lignin (SL) was revealed as the ideal condition in this rust conversion study with a value of 84.21 %. The treated rust powder with 5 wt% of SL was then further gone through several complementary analyses, which revealed that the treated rust had nearly transformed into an amorphous state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available