4.5 Article

Lunar laser ranging: The pointing error analysis to Lunokhod 1 and Lunokhod 2

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 407, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2023.115792

Keywords

Lunar laser ranging; Pointing errors; Effective echo rates; Superconducting nanowire single-photon de; tectors; Corner-cube reflector

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the optical performance of corner-cube reflectors (CCRs) at near-infrared wavelength and measures the effective echo rates of L1 and L2 through experiments. The results demonstrate that there is an error in the initial pointing of the CCRs.
The corner-cube reflectors (CCRs) are small optical instruments designed to accurately measure the distance between the Earth and the Moon. Signals from L1 (Lunokhod 1) and L2 (Lunokhod 2) can be used for higher precision analysis of lunar libration than Apollo reflector. Here, we describe the optical performance of L1 and L2 at near-infrared wavelength. Theoretically, because of the initial direction and lunar librations, the surfaces of these arrays do not, in general, point directly to the Earth. The laser incident angles for the CCRs and the far-field diffraction patterns (FFDP) of individual CCRs of possible incident angles are calculated. Finally, extract the optical cross-section as a function of incident angles. In the experiment, for the first time, superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors (SNSPDs) at a wavelength of 1064 nm are designed and fabricated aiming at lunar laser ranging (LLR), and the effective echo rates of L1 and L2 are measured. Using experimental results to check the orientation of the CCRs. The experimental results show that there is an error in the initial pointing of the CCRs, the initial pointing angles of L1 and L2 are about from 10o to 40o.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available