4.0 Article

Improved Methods for Acetocarmine and Haematoxylin Staining to Visualize Chromosomes in the Filamentous Green Alga Zygnema (Charophyta)

Journal

BIO-PROTOCOL
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

BIO-PROTOCOL
DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.31.526407

Keywords

Acetocarmine; Haematoxylin; Hydroxyquinoline; Chromosomes; Zygnema; Zygnematophyceae; Charophyta; Light microscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the chromosome visualization methods in the filamentous green alga Zygnema. Existing protocols were modified to allow reliable chromosome counting in this genus. The challenges of interference from cell wall components and random cell divisions were addressed.
Genome sizes of Zygnema spp. vary greatly, being unknown whether polyploidization occurred. The exact number of chromosomes in this genus is unknown since counting methods established for higher plants cannot be applied to green algae. The massive presence of pectins and arabinogalactan proteins in the cell wall interferes with the uptake of staining solutions; moreover, cell divisions in green algae are not restricted to meristems as in higher plants, which is another limiting factor. Cell divisions occur randomly in the thallus, due to the intercalary growth of algal filaments. Therefore, we increased the number of cell divisions via synchronization by changing the light cycle (10:14 h light/dark). The number of observed mitotic stages peaked at the beginning of the dark cycle. This protocol describes two methods for the visualization of chromosomes in the filamentous green alga Zygnema. Existing protocols were modified, leading to improved acetocarmine and haematoxylin staining methods as investigated by light microscopy. A freeze-shattering approach with liquid nitrogen was applied to increase the accessibility of the haematoxylin dye. These modified protocols allowed reliable chromosome counting in the genus Zygnema.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available