4.2 Article

Phosphorus retention in a lowland Neotropical stream following an eight-year enrichment experiment

Journal

FRESHWATER SCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 1-11

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/684491

Keywords

phosphorus; sediments; sorption; storage; stream; tropical

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation through the Long-Term Studies in Environmental Biology program [DEB 9528434, DEB 0075339, DEB 0545463]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human alteration of the global P cycle has led to widespread P loading in freshwater ecosystems. Much research has been devoted to the capacity of wetlands and lakes to serve as long-term sinks for P inputs from the watershed, but we know much less about the potential of headwater streams to serve in this role. We assessed storage and retention of P in biotic and abiotic compartments after an 8-y experimental P addition to a 1st-order stream in a Neotropical wet forest. Sediment P extractions indicated that nearly all P storage was in the form of Fe- and Al-bound P (similar to 700 mu g P/g dry sediment), similar to nearby naturally high-P streams. At the end of the enrichment, similar to 25% of the total P added over the 8-y study was still present in sediments within 200 m of the injection site, consistent with water-column measurements showing sustained levels of high net P uptake throughout the experiment. Sediment P declined to baseline levels (similar to 100 mu g P/g dry sediment) over 4 y after the enrichment ended. Leaf-litter P content increased nearly 2x over background levels during P enrichment and was associated with a 3x increase in microbial respiration rates, although these biotic responses were low compared to nearby naturally high P streams. Biotic storage accounted for <0.03% of retention of the added P. Our results suggest that the high sorption capacity of these sediments dampened the biotic effects of P loading and altered the timing and quantity of P exported downstream.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available