Arsenic pollution, geochemical fractions, and leaching characteristics in soil samples from four contaminated sites in the Beijiang River Basin, South China

To remediate historically polluted sites before their land-use changes, it is essential to understand the concentration distribution, geochemical fraction, and migratory behavior of As in soil with varied particle sizes for the use of a sieving procedure. This study investigated the amount and percentage of As in soil with different particle sizes (0.25, 0.25-1, and 1-2 mm) as well as its toxicity characteristic in leaching procedure at four previously contaminated sites in the Beijiang River Basin, South China. The results showed that the total As concentration in the collected soils ranged from 70.1 to 402.8 mg/kg, and only a few percent of soil particle samples had As contents below the local risk threshold value of 60 mg/kg. The amorphous hydrous oxide bound, crystalline hydrous oxide bound, and residual fractions (F3-F5) of the geochemical fraction of As in soil of polluted sites accounted for 82.2-95.7% of the total As distribution. However, the concentration of As in non-specifically bound fractions increased with the mass ratio of soil with coarse particle sizes due to the negative correlation of Fe-bearing minerals concentration with the mass ratio of soil with coarse particle size. According to redundancy analysis, soil with coarse particle sizes and non-specifically bound As were mostly responsible for the As concentration in the leachate. These findings confirmed that a sieving process was not suitable for the remediation of soil As at four historically contaminated sites in the Beijiang River Basin due to the high concentration of As in soil and non-negligible environmental risk of labile extractable As in soil with coarse particle size.

Automated summary

This study investigated the distribution and migratory behavior of As in soil at four contaminated sites in the Beijiang River Basin in South China. The results showed that the concentration of As in the soil was high and posed an environmental risk. The sieving procedure was found to be unsuitable for the remediation of soil As at these polluted sites.