4.4 Article

Similarity and differences in age, gender, ethnicity, and education as explanatory factors of tie loss in the core discussion network

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Review Business

WHAT DOES HOMOPHILY DO? A REVIEW OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF HOMOPHILY

Gokhan Ertug et al.

Summary: This article reviews management research on the consequences of homophily and provides structured summaries at the individual, dyad, team, organizational, and macro levels. It also raises issues and opportunities for future research and discusses broader research directions.

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS (2022)

Article Anthropology

How new is New? Who gets added in a panel study of personal networks?

Shira Offer et al.

Summary: Using longitudinal data from UCNets, this study examined new ties and categorized them as either truly new or awakened ties. The results showed that among younger respondents, half of the new ties were truly new, while among older respondents, two-thirds were awakened ties. However, in both groups, the majority of ties were previously listed, indicating stability in the network core.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2022)

Article Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary

'Birds of a feather' - forever? Homogeneity in adult friendship networks through the life course

Beate Volker

Summary: This paper examines the changes in homogeneity of friendship networks in terms of gender, age, and educational diversity. The results show that gender and educational homogeneity in friendships increases as people age, while age homogeneity remains unchanged. It is noteworthy that friendship remains important throughout a person's life, with only few respondents reporting having no friends.

ADVANCES IN LIFE COURSE RESEARCH (2022)

Article Anthropology

Whom do we lose? The case of dissimilarity in personal networks

Marina Tulin et al.

Summary: This study reveals that ties to dissimilar others are more likely to be lost faster, especially in the early stage of relationships. However, whether it is lack of meeting opportunities, preferences for similarity, or network embeddedness, none of these factors can fully explain why ties to dissimilar individuals decay more rapidly than ties to similar individuals.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2021)

Article Anthropology

Who is dropped and why? Methodological and substantive accounts for network loss

Claude S. Fischer et al.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2020)

Article Political Science

Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior

Gregory A. Huber et al.

JOURNAL OF POLITICS (2017)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

Douglas Bates et al.

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2015)

Article Geriatrics & Gerontology

Social Disadvantage and Network Turnover

Benjamin Cornwell

JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2015)

Article Anthropology

How stable is the core discussion network?

Mario Luis Small et al.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2015)

Article Anthropology

Measuring segregation in social networks

Michal Bojanowski et al.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2014)

Article Sociology

Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust

Thomas A. DiPrete et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY (2011)

Article Anthropology

Longitudinal analysis of personal networks. The case of Argentinean migrants in Spain

Miranda J. Lubbers et al.

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2010)

Article Sociology

Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network

Gueorgi Kossinets et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY (2009)

Article Anthropology

Bridge decay

RS Burt

SOCIAL NETWORKS (2002)