4.7 Article

Generation of evidence-based carboplatin dosing guidelines for neonates and infants

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02456

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to optimize the doses of carboplatin in infants by utilizing real world clinical pharmacology data. The results show that optimizing the weight-based doses to 6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg per day can effectively achieve the target AUC values, thereby reducing drug exposure variability.
Background To optimally dose childhood cancer patients it is essential that we apply evidence-based dosing approaches. Carboplatin is commonly dosed to achieve a cumulative target exposure (AUC) in children, with target AUC values of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min defined. To achieve these exposures patients are dosed at 6.6 mg/kg/day or 4.4 mg/kg for patients <5 kg. The current study uses real world clinical pharmacology data to optimise body weight-based doses to effectively target AUCs of 5.2-7.8 mg/ml.min in infants.Methods Carboplatin exposures were determined across 165 treatment cycles in 82 patients <= 10 kg. AUC and clearance values were determined by Bayesian modelling from samples collected on day 1. These parameters were utilised to assess current dosing variability, determine doses required to achieve target AUC values and predict change in AUC using the modified dose.Results No significant differences in clearance were identified between patients <5 kg and 5-10 kg. Consequently, for patients <5 kg, 4.4 mg/kg dosing was not sufficient to achieve a target AUC of 5.2 mg/ml.min, with <55% of patients within 25% of this target. Optimised daily doses for patients <= 10 kg were 6 mg/kg and 9 mg/kg for cumulative carboplatin target exposures of 5.2 and 7.8 mg/ml.min, respectively.Conclusions Adoption of these evidence-based carboplatin doses in neonates and infants will reduce drug exposure variability and positively impact treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available