4.8 Article

Full Coverage Path Planning Recombination Framework for Unmanned Vehicles With Multi-Objective Constraints

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2023.3319732

Keywords

Cell recombination algorithm; full coverage path planning (FCPP); index evaluation method; optimal solution space

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a novel multi-objective coverage path planning recombination framework to address the problem of full coverage path planning for unmanned vehicles in an obstacle environment. By utilizing methods such as coordinate system transformation and multi-cell recombination, the solution space and trajectory planning performance are optimized. The results demonstrate that the proposed framework can provide an optimal solution to the problem.
This article aims to solve the problem of full coverage path planning (FCPP) for unmanned vehicles with multi-objective constraints in an obstacle environment. A novel multi-objective coverage path planning recombination (MCPPR) framework is proposed to enhance the overall performance of the planned trajectory. The coordinate system transformation method is proposed to reduce the proportion of obstacles coverage area and optimize the solution space. Based on the improved FCPP mapping algorithm, a multicell recombination algorithm is developed. The constraints include coverage rate, overlap rate, trajectory length, and cumulative turning angle. An optimal double-layer agent motion and an improved probabilistic roadmaps algorithm are presented to plan obstacle avoidance paths for connecting neighboring cells. The final planning trajectory is smoothed using the Dubins algorithm. An index evaluation method is proposed to translate all indicators into the same quantitative space and to select the optimal trajectory. The results of the simulations and experiments show that the proposed MCPPR framework can provide an optimal solution to the FCPP problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available