4.7 Article

Buckling-induced instability in topology optimization of compliant constant-force mechanisms

Journal

MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2023.105475

Keywords

Topology optimization; Compliant mechanism; Constant-force mechanism; Buckling; Instability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the causes of buckling-induced instability and proposes methods to avoid this instability. By proposing a mechanism with three torsional springs and using topology optimization models with buckling constraints, stable compliant constant-force mechanisms can be designed.
Compliant constant-force mechanisms are compliant mechanisms that provide a nearly constant force over a prescribed deflection range. Topology optimization is an effective method for compliant constant-force mechanism design. However, instabilities caused by buckling often cause the optimization algorithm to fail to converge. This study analyzes the causes of buckling -induced instability and proposes methods to avoid this instability. A mechanism with three torsional springs is proposed, and its three force-displacement curves are analyzed. These bifurcated force-displacement curves cause the optimization algorithm to be unstable. Several topology optimization models with buckling constraints are proposed for designing compliant constant-force mechanisms. Their effects are tested and analyzed in numerical examples with different target constant forces and constant-force strokes. Almost all optimization results have three hinges, corresponding to a proposed mechanism with three torsion springs. A slight change in their initial design causes a large change in the force-displacement curve, which eventually leads to buckling-induced instability. This instability can be avoided by constraining the buckling load calculated at the configuration near the start of the constant-force stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available