Journal
APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 352, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121963
Keywords
CSP; Heliostat; Soiling; Reflectance; Forecast; Cleaning resources; Operation and maintenance
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study presents a novel methodology for characterizing and predicting soiling losses in concentrated solar power operations. It found that the soiling rate is influenced by seasons and the position of heliostats, and analyzed the cost composition and the impact of different cleaning strategies on the total cleaning cost.
One of the primary cost drivers for concentrated solar power operations and maintenance is the soiling of heliostats in the solar field. Although this loss can be largely recovered through cleaning operations, the associated costs are substantial and require careful consideration in relation to productivity gains. This paper presents a novel methodology for characterizing soiling losses through experimental measure-ments. Soiling predictions were obtained by calibrating a soiling model based on field measurements from a 50 MW modular solar tower project in Mount Isa, Australia. The study found that the mean predicted soiling rate for horizontally fixed mirrors was 0.12 pp/d during low dust seasons and 0.22 pp/d during high seasons. Autoregressive time series models were employed to extend two years of onsite meteorological measurements to a 10-year period, enabling the prediction of heliostat-field soiling rates. A fixed-frequency cleaning heuristic was applied to optimize the cleaning resources for various operational policies by balancing direct cleaning resource costs against the expected lost production, which was computed by averaging multiple simulated soiling loss trajectories. Analysis of resource usage showed that the cost of fuel and operator salaries contributed 42% and 35 % respectively towards the cleaning cost. In addition, stowing heliostats in the horizontal position at night increased daily soiling rates by 114% and the total cleaning costs by 51 % relative to vertically stowed heliostat-field. Under a simplified night-time-only power production configuration, the oversized solar field effectively charged the thermal storage during the day, despite reduced mirror reflectance due to soiling. These findings suggest that the plant can maintain efficient operation even with a reduced cleaning rate. Finally, it was observed that performing cleaning operations during the day led to a 7 % increase in the total cleaning cost compared to a night-time cleaning policy. This was primarily attributed to the need to park operational heliostats for cleaning.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available